Transportation costs rarely increase because of one single decision.
A carrier raises its rates. Fuel costs rise. A delivery network expands. Customer expectations become more demanding.
In most organisations, the bigger problem isn’t that transportation has become more expensive. It’s that management can’t clearly see what is driving the increase or where to act first.
The transportation team knows freight spend is higher than last year. Finance knows the transportation budget is under pressure. Procurement is negotiating harder with carriers. Planners are working harder than ever.
And the overall picture is still unclear:
Which lanes are becoming expensive?
And, most importantly, can the organisation connect these operational decisions to actual transportation spend?
This is where SCM Champs work with companies, moving the conversation from “transportation costs are too high” to “we know exactly what is driving the cost, and we know what needs to change.”
When transportation costs increase, the immediate reaction is often to look at carrier rates. But reducing transportation costs is rarely as simple as negotiating a lower one.
A lower rate on an inefficient transportation plan can still produce a higher total cost. A company may negotiate better carrier rates and keep sending vehicles out with low utilisation; the rate looks better, but the spend doesn’t. Another may hold a strong carrier contract and still lean on premium transportation because deliveries are planned too late; the rate isn’t the real problem – how transportation is planned, executed, changed and controlled is.
That’s why we don’t treat transportation cost improvement as a standalone procurement exercise. This is also where experienced SAP TM consulting firms can help connect technology decisions with actual transportation outcomes.
One of the first challenges we address is visibility.
Management typically receives a transportation cost number. What they need is a transportation cost explanation. Knowing that spend increased 12% doesn’t tell a supply chain leader what to do about it.
Questions that need answers:
Is the increase coming from higher freight rates or from higher volume?
Answering these requires more than a finance report — it requires visibility into the transportation planning and execution process.
This is where our work with SAP Transportation Management (SAP TM) becomes important: we connect the operational side of transportation with the commercial side, so cost drivers become identifiable. A structured SAP Transportation cost analysis helps organisations move beyond a single freight-spend figure and understand the operational conditions behind it.
Instead of one large spend number, the business gets the operational factors actually driving it, and a far more actionable conversation.
Visibility alone doesn’t reduce transportation cost.
Our objective isn’t to give management more information. It’s to make that information actionable.
That means we look at:
SAP TM configuration
This is why companies often look beyond traditional Transportation cost optimisation firms when they need improvements that connect planning, configuration and execution rather than focusing only on cost reporting.
Transportation planning involves competing objectives:
The business wants lower freight costs
A plan that optimises for only one of these will create problems elsewhere:
| If the plan is built to optimise for… | It tends to create… |
| Shortest distance | Poor vehicle utilisation |
| Maximum consolidation | Delivery delays |
| Fastest delivery | More premium transportation |
| Lowest-cost carrier | Operational reliability issues |
Transportation optimisation has to reflect the business’s actual priorities, not the most technically elegant model.
Our role is to help companies translate those priorities into a transportation planning model that SAP TM can actually work with, reviewing the constraints, cost settings, planning parameters, resources, routes and delivery requirements that feed it.
Vehicle utilisation is one of the simplest transportation metrics to understand and one of the easiest places for hidden costs to accumulate. A truck moving with significant unused capacity still generates a full transportation cost.
The scale of this problem, industry-wide, is not small. In our experience, deadhead (empty) mileage can account for nearly one in every six miles driven, while average trucking operating costs can reach $2.336 per mile. While still consuming fuel, driver time, and equipment life.
Whether that capacity sits in a private fleet or gets priced into carrier rates, it still has to be accounted for. And when the same inefficiency turns up again and again — across the same lanes, regions, or customer groups — it's the transportation network's overall utilisation that takes the hit. Fixing that isn't as simple as telling planners to load more onto each vehicle.
The system has to weigh:
We assess whether the transportation planning process is actually capturing available consolidation and capacity opportunities, and where it isn’t, we work on the planning configuration and business rules needed to close the gap, without compromising the requirements that matter. The goal is straightforward: move more of the right freight, with the right transportation resource, at the right cost.
Mileage is another area where cost grows quietly. A route can look operationally acceptable while still creating unnecessary travel.
Common causes:
Poor sequencing
One inefficient movement on its own rarely looks significant. Thousands of similar movements do — which is especially true for organisations running complex transportation networks.
That’s why our approach examines how the network is being planned rather than reviewing individual trips in isolation, assessing whether SAP TM is considering the relevant relationships, routes, resources, capacities and constraints across the whole network.
The goal is a planning environment where unnecessary movement gets identified and reduced systematically, turning cost optimisation from a manual planner exercise into a repeatable business process.
Not every transportation cost problem comes from a bad route. Sometimes it comes from a late decision.
What a late decision typically triggers:
Carrier availability becomes limited
By the time the freight reaches the customer, the delivery commitment may be met at a much higher cost. This is why transportation cost management can’t be separated from planning discipline.
We help organisations identify where these late decisions are occurring and how SAP TM can support earlier, more structured planning, reducing the situations where the business is effectively paying extra because the transportation decision was made too late.
Carrier selection has a direct impact on cost — but the lowest rate isn’t always the lowest total cost.
A carrier with a competitive rate may have limited availability.
The challenge is making these calls consistently, rather than relying on individual planner judgement.
We help organisations review how carriers and transportation resources are represented and used within their SAP TM processes to establish a more controlled, repeatable approach to carrier selection — one that reflects the commercial and operational requirements of the business.
This is especially valuable for organisations running multiple carriers, regions, transportation modes or operating entities, where consistency is what improves both control and scalability.
Sometimes transportation planning looks like the problem when the real issue is the data feeding it. We regularly find:
Incorrect locations
Small data problems produce poor transportation decisions — and repeated across hundreds or thousands of shipments, they become a financial problem.
This is why SCM Champs’ assessment doesn’t stop at process design. We look at the master data and configuration SAP TM depends on to confirm the planning engine is working from information that actually represents the operating environment. A transportation optimisation model can only be as good as the information and business rules behind it.
Transportation doesn’t operate in isolation:
Orders originate in enterprise processes.
When these processes are poorly connected, transportation teams compensate with spreadsheets, manual checks, emails, and repeated system updates — which creates more than administrative work:
A plan built on outdated or incomplete information leads to unnecessary movement.
SCM Champs’ role includes examining these integration points and identifying where the SAP landscape is preventing transportation teams from making timely, informed decisions.
For senior management, transportation data needs to answer the business questions, not system questions:
Why is transportation spends are increasing?
This is the SAP TM environment and reporting approach SCM Champs helps build, so transportation leaders can answer these questions with confidence — moving from retrospective reporting toward operational control.
Instead of discovering at month-end that transportation spend increased, the organisation should be able to see the operational conditions contributing to it and act earlier.
Not every transport problem is worth the same attention. Trying to do everything at once can stretch the resources and make it harder to manage the problem.
The biggest opportunities tend to follow a few clear patterns. For example, a small number of high volume lanes may be responsible for a disproportionate share of excess freight costs.
The right fix is driven by the underlying cost structure of the business.
We help identify the highest-value opportunities and focus SAP TM improvements where they produce the most meaningful operational and financial impact.
Cost reduction shouldn’t come at the expense of the operation. A strategy that cuts costs but creates late deliveries isn’t a successful strategy. Neither is one that improves utilisation but makes planning too complex for planners to use consistently.
SCM Champs’ approach is built on balance — transportation processes that weigh:
Cost
Every transportation decision involves trade-offs. The technology’s role isn’t to eliminate them; it’s to make them visible and manageable.
When SCM Champs engages with a company facing rising transportation costs, we don’t start by assuming the answer is another optimisation setting. We start by understanding the business problem:
From there, we can find where the real gaps are. Depending on the business, that may involve:
Often, it’s a combination. Our role is to bring these elements together into one practical improvement programme, rather than treating each issue as a separate technology problem.
Increasing transportation costs are often treated as an unavoidable cost of doing business. They shouldn’t be.
Some cost increases are market-driven and genuinely unavoidable. Others are created by how the transportation network is planned and managed. The challenge for management is knowing the difference and that requires visibility. But visibility alone isn’t enough. The business needs the ability to act.
SCM Champs role as a certified SAP partner is to help make that happen:
Working with companies to identify where transportation costs are being created
Because the objective was never another transportation report. It’s a clear, consistent answer to three questions:
Where is the money going? Why is it going there? What should we change?
If transportation spend is climbing in your organisation, and you don’t yet have a clear answer for what’s driving it, that’s exactly where we start. Our Free Transportation Assessment reviews your SAP TM planning, data and execution process to show you precisely where the cost is coming from & what to fix first.