{"id":2009,"date":"2026-06-30T08:50:33","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T08:50:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/?p=2009"},"modified":"2026-09-14T13:09:09","modified_gmt":"2026-09-14T13:09:09","slug":"sap-ewm-rollouts-stall-first-site","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/sap-ewm-rollouts-stall-first-site\/","title":{"rendered":"The Template-Driven Rollout Factory: How Global Enterprises Standardize SAP EWM Across Every Warehouse"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Building one global template is the easy part. Rolling it out cleanly across 20, 50, or 100 warehouses is where most SAP programmes lose their footing. This is the methodology SCM CHAMPS uses to make global SAP EWM deployments repeatable, scalable, and predictable \u2014 wave after wave.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>In short:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Stop treating each warehouse as a new project. Build one validated SAP EWM template, deploy it in controlled waves, and localise only where law or physical reality forces you to. Done right, every site costs <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">less<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> effort than the one before \u2014 not more.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Why most global SAP rollouts slow down after the first warehouse<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first warehouse almost always goes well. It has executive attention, the best people, a generous timeline, and the patience to get the design right. The flagship goes live, everyone celebrates, and the programme declares the template &#8220;done&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Then the second site starts asking questions. Their inbound process is a little different. They want one extra report. Their yard works another way, so could the putaway logic flex just slightly? The third site has its own list. By the tenth site, the \u201cglobal template\u201d has quietly become ten dialects of itself, each maintained separately, each a small new project with its own testing, its own consultants, and its own assumptions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is the trap. Every warehouse that gets treated as a fresh implementation drags the programme back toward where it started. Cost climbs instead of falling. Timelines stretch instead of shrinking. Left unchecked, this is how a standardisation programme quietly turns back into fifty separate ones \u2014 each with its own consultants, its own testing, its own assumptions, and its own bill. The whole promise of standardisation \u2014 lower run cost, cleaner data, simpler upgrades \u2014 leaks away one \u201csmall exception\u201d at a time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The fix is a shift in mindset. Stop treating each warehouse as a project; treat it as a product deployment. A new site shouldn\u2019t be a fresh implementation \u2014 it should be the next install of an already-proven template.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What a template-driven rollout factory actually is<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A template-driven rollout factory replaces one-off projects with one repeatable production line. As an SAP EWM rollout strategy, the thinking is borrowed from manufacturing: design the product once, build the tooling once, then produce units predictably and improve the line as you go.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In SAP EWM terms, that means five disciplines working together:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Design one global operating model<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 the way the company wants warehouses to run, independent of any single site.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Build one validated SAP EWM template<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 configuration, integration, RF transactions, warehouse structure, master data, and test assets, packaged to be deployed, not copy-pasted.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Roll out in controlled waves<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 sites grouped and sequenced deliberately, not launched all at once.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Localise only where law or physical reality demands it<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 and challenge everything else.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Govern and improve continuously<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 every go-live feeds lessons back into the template so the next wave is cleaner.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">None of these is novel on its own. The discipline is in running all five at once, every time, without letting the standard erode.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Why traditional rollouts get expensive \u2014 and template-driven ones get cheaper<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The cost difference between the two approaches isn\u2019t a rounding error; it compounds with every site.<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><b>Traditional rollout<\/b><\/td>\n<td><b>Template-driven rollout factory<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Every warehouse starts from scratch<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One validated template deployed everywhere<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Different consultants make different decisions<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Standard design governed centrally<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Long, repeated testing cycles<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reusable test scripts and data<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Many process variations<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Standardised operations with controlled exceptions<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Heavy per-site customisation<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Localisation only where mandated<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Painful, fragmented upgrades<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One template to upgrade, once<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The reason the right column wins is reuse. Across large global SAP programmes, it\u2019s typically observed that 40\u201370% of the global template carries straight into a new site\u2019s first wave, with only the genuine local delta added on top. That reused portion is work you don\u2019t pay for again at warehouse two, ten, or fifty \u2014 and unlike a one-time discount, the saving accumulates across the rollout.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The five building blocks of a template-driven rollout factory<\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">1. Global process standardisation<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Before any configuration, the program has to agree on how a warehouse runs <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">as a company<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, not as a location. In EWM, the core flows that should look the same everywhere are:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Receiving<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 inbound delivery handling, deconsolidation, quality inspection triggers<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Putaway<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 storage type search and bin determination strategies<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Picking<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 wave management, pick strategies, and replenishment logic<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Packing<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 packing specifications and handling-unit creation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Shipping<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 staging, loading, and goods-issue posting<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Physical inventory<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 counting methods and reconciliation<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If two sites genuinely run receiving differently for no legal or physical reason, that\u2019s usually a sign the operating model wasn\u2019t settled \u2014 not a sign the template needs another variant.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2. Template architecture<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Good SAP EWM template design is what separates a smooth SAP warehouse implementation from a painful one. A template that can actually be rolled out is more than a configured system \u2014 it\u2019s a packaged, documented asset:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>EWM configuration<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 warehouse structure (storage types, sections, bins, activity areas) and storage control<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Integration<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 queues, distribution model, and interfaces to<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/sap-modules\/s4-hana\"> <b>S\/4HANA<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> or ECC, plus MFS, automation, or carriers where relevant<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>RF framework<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 the radio-frequency transactions operators actually use on the floor<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Master data<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 product, packaging specification, and warehouse master-data standards<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Documentation &amp; test scripts<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 process definitions, a clear \u201cglobal vs. local\u201d map, and reusable test cases<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The documentation and test assets are what separate a template from a lucky first project \u2014 and what make the second deployment faster than the first.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3. Wave-based deployment strategy<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Big-bang global go-lives concentrate risk into a single date and a single weekend. Waves spread it out and turn each release into a rehearsal for the next.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The industry standard is to industrialise rollouts into waves and clusters \u2014 grouping sites by similar size, geography, and complexity \u2014 so deployments run in parallel and lessons compound. Wave 1 is effectively a pilot: it proves the template works in the real world and exposes whatever the design workshops missed. Every subsequent wave is faster because the team is more practised, the test assets are hardened, and the template absorbs each fix.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4. Controlled localisation<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is where templates live or die. The rule used by mature programmes is deliberately strict: only legal and statutory requirements justify a change to the template. In practice that means localisation should cover:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tax rules<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Country and regulatory requirements<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mandatory labels and documentation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Local carrier integrations<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Language<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Statutory compliance and reporting<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Everything else stays standard. The hard part isn\u2019t writing this rule \u2014 it\u2019s holding the line on it. A surprising number of \u201clegal requirements\u201d raised during rollout turn out to be habits, preferences, or business practices that users have simply always followed. Each one that gets implemented as a local exception is a country-specific solution that quietly contradicts the template. The skill a good rollout partner brings is the judgement to tell a genuine legal mandate from a comfortable habit \u2014 and the governance to say no to the latter.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5. Governance and continuous improvement<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A template-driven factory needs a body that owns the standard \u2014 global process owners and a change-control authority that decides what enters the template and what stays local. Without it, the template fragments back into the mess it was meant to prevent.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Governance also runs the other way. Each wave brings real improvements: a cleaner test script, a better RF flow, a fix to a putaway strategy, and those roll into the master template so each site gets a better starting point than the last. \u201cIt\u2019s that feedback loop that makes the factory better with scale, not just faster.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That feedback loop helps the programme get better as it scales, not just faster.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The proof: why this gets faster every time<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A template-driven rollout isn\u2019t a theory \u2014 it\u2019s how large SAP programmes are actually industrialised.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Industry experience consistently shows that 40\u201370% of a global template carries straight into each new site\u2019s first wave, with only the delta the genuinely local pieces added on top. That reused share is the work you don\u2019t repeat at the next warehouse, and it\u2019s where the speed and cost savings come from.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The pattern holds across the industry: rollouts are deliberately grouped into waves and clusters, batched by similar size, geography, and complexity, so each wave runs in parallel and each one is smoother than the last because the lessons feed straight back into the template.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">And the discipline that protects all of it is localisation control \u2014 the strict rule that only legal and tax requirements justify a template change, with every other local request challenged rather than waved through. That single line of governance is the difference between a template that scales and one that slowly turns back into fifty separate projects.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For context on scale: large global template programmes commonly span two to five years, and individual multi-site rollout projects typically run from six months to two years depending on the number of locations and the degree of customisation. A repeatable factory is precisely what keeps a programme of that size from drifting \u2014 and it\u2019s why each warehouse<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/\"> <b>SCM CHAMPS<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> deployment is designed to cost less effort than the one before it, not more.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">How decision-makers should evaluate a rollout partner<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If you\u2019re a CIO, supply chain director, or program manager scoping a multi-site EWM program, the question to ask a partner isn\u2019t \u201cCan you implement SAP EWM?\u201d Plenty of firms can land one warehouse. The questions that actually predict a successful rollout are different:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Do they have an existing rollout methodology, or will they invent a new one at each site?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A real factory has a named, repeatable method, not improvised consulting.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Can they standardise aggressively without ignoring genuine local requirements?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Both failure modes are expensive: too rigid and sites can\u2019t operate legally; too flexible and the template dissolves.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Have they delivered multi-site rollouts \u2014 not just one strong implementation?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The skill of the second, fifth, and tenth deployment is different from the skill of the first.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Can they cut rollout time through reusable assets?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Ask to see template documentation and test scripts, not just slideware.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Do they provide governance after go-live?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Hypercare and ongoing change control are where standardisation is either protected or lost.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Can they actually run global deployment waves?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Sequencing, clustering, and parallel execution are their own discipline.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Do they understand warehouse operations as well as they understand SAP?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Technology alone doesn\u2019t make a warehouse run.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A partner who welcomes these questions is usually one who has answered them before.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">How SCM CHAMPS approaches template-driven SAP EWM rollouts<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We don\u2019t run warehouse rollouts as a series of projects. We run them as a production line \u2014 one validated template, deployed wave after wave, getting cleaner each time. The test we hold ourselves to is simple: if site ten is more painful than site one, the methodology has failed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What we bring to that:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Senior-led advisory.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> You work with experienced consultants, not a bench of juniors learning on your programme. The people who shape your template are the ones who\u2019ve sat in the rollout room.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Certified SAP professionals.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Real SAP EWM depth, so the standardise vs localise calls are made on expertise, not guesswork.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Hands-on EWM project experience.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> We know how receiving, putaway, picking, and the rest actually behave on the floor \u2014 and where rollouts quietly go wrong.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Five principles drive every programme:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Standardise first.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Settle the global operating model before touching configuration.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Validate early.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Prove the template in a real pilot wave, not a design document.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Deploy in waves.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Sequence sites by size, geography, and complexity so each release de-risks the next.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Localise only where necessary.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Hold the legal-and-tax-only line, and challenge everything else.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Improve continuously.<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Feed every wave\u2019s lessons back into the master template.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Frequently asked questions<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><b>What is an SAP EWM template implementation?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> It\u2019s the practice of building one validated EWM configuration \u2014 processes, integration, RF transactions, warehouse structure, master data, and test assets \u2014 and deploying it across multiple warehouses, instead of configuring each site from scratch.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What is a global rollout template?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> A packaged, reusable design of how warehouses should run globally. It defines the standard processes and configuration that every site inherits, leaving only mandated local items to be added per location.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What is a wave-based rollout strategy?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Warehouses are set up in groups, rather than all at once. Sites are clustered based on factors like size, geography and complexity, so deployments can be run in parallel, with lessons learned in one group applied to improve the next.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>When should companies localise SAP EWM?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Only when a legal, tax, statutory, or genuine physical constraint requires it \u2014 for example, country tax rules, mandatory labels, local carriers, or language. Preferences and habits should stay on the global standard.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>How many warehouses should be included in one rollout wave?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> There\u2019s no fixed number; it depends on site complexity and available resources. Early waves are kept small (often a single pilot) to validate the template, with later waves widening as the team and assets mature.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the biggest reason global SAP rollouts fail?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Loss of template discipline. When local exceptions are accepted without strict governance, the global template fragments into many site-specific variants, and the cost and complexity the program set out to remove come straight back.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>How does a template reduce implementation cost?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Through reuse. With a large share of the template, typically 40\u201370% in big programmes, carried into each new site, the configuration, testing, and design work isn\u2019t repeated everywhere, so per-site cost and time fall as the rollout progresses.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Can every warehouse use the same SAP EWM configuration?<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Largely, yes \u2014 the global core (receiving, putaway, picking, packing, shipping, inventory) should be identical. The only differences are through legally or physically mandated elements, which are added as controlled extensions.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Key takeaways<\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Build one standard template instead of treating every warehouse as a new project.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Validate it thoroughly in a real pilot wave before scaling.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Deploy in waves, clustered by size, geography, and complexity.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Localise only where law or physical reality demands it \u2014 challenge everything else.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Govern the standard centrally so it doesn\u2019t fragment.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Measure every rollout and feed the lessons back in.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Improve the template after every deployment so the next site starts ahead of the last.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A global SAP EWM programme done this way doesn\u2019t get heavier with each warehouse. It gets lighter, which is exactly the point.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fix your template before your second warehouse<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Template erosion compounds. It\u2019s cheap to get the standardise and wave approach right before site one and expensive to unpick once five sites have each gone their own way. The earlier you set the template, the more every later warehouse benefits.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Book a free rollout-readiness conversation with our senior<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/sap-modules\/extended-warehouse-management\"> <b>SAP EWM<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> team. We\u2019ll look at your sites, show you where a template-driven approach saves the most time and risk, and tell you what your first wave should look like.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Building one global template is the easy part. Rolling it out cleanly across 20, 50,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2012,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[317,316,319,318],"class_list":["post-2009","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sap-ewm","tag-global-rollouts","tag-sap-ewm-rollout","tag-sap-ewm-template-approach","tag-template-approach"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2009"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2009\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2282,"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2009\/revisions\/2282"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2012"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scmchamps.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}